The Concept

Introduction

      Emotional intelligence and inner growth are more widely discussed today, than it was ever before. Every day, new books, lectures, websites, and blogs are published, each offering their own superficial approach. The million-dollar question is: How can we utilize our emotions in the most effective way and neutralize or balance their residual toxicity? (Goleman, 1995; Bar-On & Parker, 2000).

      One might wonder if it’s necessary to study all of the available information, in order to address a single issue. This raises another question: Why should we, the authors, add on another approach on top of all that? Will it help the average reader or just clutter their mind even more?

      The answer is simple, that this website will not occupy any of your brain-hard-drive storage. Instead, it will clarify and simplify everything you know, making it easy to understand, remember, and use.

A Digest

      This website does not aim to provide new information or instructions that you are unaware of or cannot find elsewhere. Instead, we aim to distill everything into an easy-to-understand and clear format. It compiles everything published into a short, innovative form, and will potentially eliminate the need for piles of books or complicated research papers that require scholarly genius to comprehend. Our mission is to make the understanding easy and accessible to any reader.

Core Feelings

      But how is this possible?

      Our approach involves separating and clarifying the complexities of our psyche into core feelings. Once we are mindful of the building blocks that compose us, we connect better to our desires and capabilities, as well as our duties. This allows us to optimize all of them very effectively.

Building Blocks

      Many readers have reported that simply viewing these core feelings as our building blocks, was sufficient enough for them to promote significant growth. They have seen advancement in all areas of our effectiveness, serenity, and performance. Over time, these advantages grew and expand also into different areas.

      Additionally, we offer pages for "ignite" and "exercise" that are completely new. If you are qualified, you can use these examples to address many other issues and difficulties.

Motivational Interviewing (MI)

       This approach is particularly effective in helping individuals resolve ambivalent feelings and insecurities to find the internal motivation they need to change their behavior. It's commonly used in addiction treatment but has broader applications as well.

Pros:

  1. Client-Centered Approach: MI empowers clients by focusing on their intrinsic motivations and fostering self-efficacy (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).
  2. Effective in Behavioral Change: It is particularly effective in facilitating behavior change in areas such as addiction, health management, and lifestyle modifications (Hettema, Steele, & Miller, 2005).
  3. Empathy and Support: MI emphasizes empathy and a supportive counseling relationship, which can enhance client engagement and satisfaction (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).
  4. Adaptability: MI can be adapted to various settings and integrated with other therapeutic approaches, increasing its versatility (Moyers, Manuel, & Ernst, 2014).
  5. Brief and Focused: MI sessions can be brief yet impactful, making them suitable for various contexts, including healthcare and counseling (Lundahl et al., 2010).

Cons:

  1. Requires Skilled Practitioners: MI relies heavily on the skill and training of the practitioner, which can affect its effectiveness (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).
  2. Initial Resistance: Some clients may initially resist the collaborative approach of MI, preferring more directive forms of therapy (Hettema, Steele, & Miller, 2005).
  3. Not a Standalone Solution: While effective for facilitating change, MI may need to be combined with other interventions for comprehensive treatment (Lundahl et al., 2010).
  4. Time-Consuming Training: Training practitioners in MI can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, potentially limiting its accessibility (Moyers, Manuel, & Ernst, 2014).
  5. Limited Long-Term Evidence: While MI shows promise, there is limited evidence on its long-term effectiveness compared to some other therapies (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).

Summary

       Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a client-centered approach that effectively facilitates behavioral change by focusing on intrinsic motivation and fostering self-efficacy. It is adaptable, promotes empathy and support, and can be integrated with other therapeutic methods, making it a versatile and impactful tool. However, MI requires skilled practitioners, which can limit its effectiveness and accessibility, and clients may initially resist its collaborative nature. Additionally, MI is not a standalone solution and may need to be combined with other interventions for comprehensive treatment, and its long-term effectiveness is less established compared to some other therapies.

        OptimizeYourCapabilities.com leverages the client-centered and motivational aspects of MI by providing personalized and self-directed tools that empower users to make positive changes. The platform simplifies the complex elements of MI, making it accessible without extensive training. By offering structured programs and practical exercises, it fosters intrinsic motivation and supports behavior change effectively. Additionally, OptimizeYourCapabilities.com combines MI principles with other therapeutic techniques, ensuring a comprehensive and adaptable approach to personal

     ---- to be continued ----

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)

       Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is an evidence-based program that uses mindfulness meditation to address stress, pain, and illness. Developed by Jon Kabat-Zinn in the late 1970s, MBSR has gained widespread recognition for its effectiveness in promoting mental and physical well-being.

Pros:

  1. Stress Reduction: MBSR is highly effective in reducing stress and improving overall well-being (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
  2. Emotional Regulation: It helps individuals develop better emotional regulation and resilience (Kabat-Zinn, 2003).
  3. Holistic Approach: MBSR integrates various mindfulness techniques, such as meditation, body scans, and mindful movement, to promote relaxation and mental clarity (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
  4. Improved Focus: Practicing mindfulness can enhance focus, attention, and cognitive flexibility (Jha, Krompinger, & Baime, 2007).
  5. Better Relationships: It can lead to improved interpersonal relationships by fostering greater self-awareness and empathy (Siegel, 2007).

Cons:

  1. Time Commitment: MBSR typically involves an 8-week program with daily practice, which can be challenging for some individuals (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
  2. Initial Difficulty: The techniques may be difficult to master initially and require consistent practice (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
  3. Potential Overemphasis on Self-awareness: Some individuals might find the focus on self-awareness overwhelming or unhelpful (Kabat-Zinn, 2003).
  4. Not a Cure-All: MBSR doesn't eliminate problems but helps manage reactions to stressors (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
  5. Requires Personal Effort: It demands personal effort and commitment to see benefits (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).

Summary

       Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a highly effective program for reducing stress, improving emotional regulation, and enhancing focus, attention, and interpersonal relationships. It offers a holistic approach to well-being by integrating various mindfulness techniques. However, MBSR requires a significant time commitment, consistent practice, and personal effort, which can be challenging for some individuals. Additionally, its initial difficulty and potential overemphasis on self-awareness might be overwhelming for certain users. While MBSR helps manage reactions to stressors, it is not a cure-all for underlying problems.

       OptimizeYourCapabilities.com incorporates the benefits of MBSR by offering tools that promote the mindful comprehension of human emotion. The practice is simplified to make it more accessible and manageable for users, ensuring that the time commitment and initial difficulty are minimized. By providing guided meditations, mindfulness exercises, and reference of experience, they help users integrate mindfulness into their daily routines without overwhelming them.

 

Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT)

        Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) is a humanistic form of psychotherapy that focuses on the idea that emotions are strongly connected to identity and well-being. Here are some key benefits of EFT:

  1. Emotional Awareness: EFT helps individuals develop a deeper understanding of their emotional experiences (Greenberg, 2017).
  2. Personal Growth: EFT can help individuals create new, positive narratives about their lives (Watson, Goldman, & Greenberg, 2007).
  3. Practical Strategies: EFT provides practical strategies for managing emotions (Elliott et al., 2004).

Critiques Against Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT)

        Despite its benefits, EFT has faced several critiques:

  1. Limited Empirical Evidence: There is limited empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of EFT (Greenberg & Johnson, 1988).
  2. Research Bias: Some studies on EFT have been conducted by proponents of the approach, raising concerns about objectivity (Watson, Goldman, & Greenberg, 2007).
  3. Complexity: EFT can be complex and may require a significant time commitment from both the therapist and the patient (Elliott et al., 2004).

Summary

        Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) offers significant benefits, including enhancing emotional awareness, fostering personal growth by creating positive life narratives, and providing practical strategies for managing emotions. However, it has its drawbacks, such as limited empirical evidence supporting its effectiveness, and the complexity and time commitment required for both therapists and patients.

        OptimizeYourCapabilities.com incorporates the benefit of emotional awareness from Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) by helping individuals identify and recognize their core emotions. This process involves separating and clarifying the complexities of our psyche into core feelings, which allows individuals to connect better to their real desires and capabilities. 

       To overcome the complexity of EFT, OptimizeYourCapabilities.com have distilled all experiences into ten core emotions, providing a framework which is easy to understand. However, empirical research has not yet been done.

 

The Benefits and Critiques of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)

       Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is a structured therapy that helps individuals process and recover from traumatic experiences.

Benefits of EMDR

  1. Effective for PTSD: EMDR has been shown to be highly effective in treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other trauma-related conditions. It helps patients process and integrate traumatic memories, reducing the symptoms associated with PTSD (Shapiro, 2017).
  2. Rapid Results: Compared to traditional therapy methods, EMDR often produces faster results in reducing trauma symptoms. This efficiency can be particularly beneficial for individuals seeking quicker relief from their distress (van der Kolk, 2014).
  3. Non-Invasive: EMDR does not require detailed descriptions of the trauma, making it a less invasive option for individuals who may find it difficult to discuss their experiences in depth. This can make the therapy more accessible and comfortable for many patients (Shapiro, 2017).
  4. Holistic Healing: EMDR addresses both the emotional and cognitive aspects of trauma, promoting holistic healing and recovery. This comprehensive approach helps individuals process their experiences more thoroughly (Greenwald, 2007).
  5. Wide Application: EMDR has been adapted for various populations and settings, including children, adolescents, and individuals with complex trauma histories. This flexibility makes it a versatile tool for therapists working with diverse groups (Shapiro, 2017).

Critiques Against EMDR

  1. Scientific Controversy: Some critics argue that the mechanisms of EMDR are not fully understood and that more research is needed to validate its effectiveness. This scientific controversy can make some professionals hesitant to adopt the method (van der Kolk, 2014).
  2. Complexity of Treatment: EMDR involves multiple phases and can be complex to administer. It requires specialized training for therapists, which can add to the difficulty of implementing the therapy (Shapiro, 2017).
  3. Cost and Accessibility: The need for specialized training and certification can make EMDR more expensive and less accessible than other therapy options. This financial barrier can limit its availability to those who might benefit from it (Greenwald, 2007).
  4. Cultural Sensitivity: EMDR may not fully consider the unique cultural contexts and experiences of individuals from diverse backgrounds. This lack of cultural sensitivity can affect the therapy's effectiveness in some populations (Shapiro, 2017).
  5. Individual Differences: EMDR may not be suitable for everyone, and individual differences can affect the therapy's effectiveness. Personalized approaches are necessary to ensure the best outcomes for each patient (van der Kolk, 2014).

Summary

       In summary, the benefit of EMDR lies in its ability to effectively treat PTSD and trauma-related conditions through a structured, non-invasive process. However, its scientific controversy, complexity, and cultural sensitivity can be potential limitations for some individuals.

       "OptimizeYourCapabilities.com" includes exercises that enhance the 'processing' process, which aligns with the benefits of EMDR. This approach focuses on core emotions within an easily referenced framework, where each core emotion can be separately processed while removing the stress and trauma which is storaged beneath. It doesn't require to delve into any specific traumas unless the client self is bringing it up. 

 

The Comprehensive Benefits and Critiques of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)

       Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is an integrative therapeutic approach that combines cognitive therapy with mindfulness practices. Originally developed to prevent relapse in individuals with recurrent depression, MBCT has been recognized for its broad applicability in enhancing overall mental health. This article explores the extensive benefits of MBCT, addresses some of its critiques, and examines why certain platforms might emphasize its positive aspects.

Comprehensive Benefits of MBCT

  1. Prevention of Depression Relapse: MBCT has been shown to be particularly effective in preventing the recurrence of depression, especially among individuals who have experienced multiple episodes. By teaching mindfulness skills, MBCT helps individuals recognize and distance themselves from habitual negative thought patterns, reducing the likelihood of relapse (Segal et al., 2018).
  2. Reduction of Anxiety and Stress: Incorporating mindfulness into therapy helps reduce anxiety and stress, fostering a sense of calm and well-being (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). This can lead to improved mental health and a better quality of life.
  3. Enhanced Emotional Regulation: The mindfulness practices in MBCT promote greater awareness of thoughts and feelings, enabling individuals to respond to them more healthily. This increased awareness leads to better emotional regulation and resilience (Teasdale et al., 2000).
  4. Improved Cognitive Functioning: MBCT has been found to enhance cognitive functions, including attention and memory, by reducing the impact of negative thoughts (Williams et al., 2014). This improvement in cognitive functioning can positively affect daily activities and overall mental clarity.
  5. Holistic Approach to Mental Health: MBCT integrates the structured approach of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with mindfulness meditation, offering a comprehensive method for addressing mental health issues. This holistic approach helps improve overall mental health and well-being by addressing both the cognitive and emotional aspects of mental health (Segal et al., 2018).
  6. Non-Pharmacological Option: MBCT provides a non-pharmacological alternative for individuals seeking to manage their mental health without medication. This can be beneficial for those who prefer or require non-drug interventions.

Critiques Against MBCT

  1. Accessibility: MBCT requires trained practitioners and can be time-intensive, which may limit accessibility for some individuals (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
  2. Complexity: The integration of mindfulness and cognitive therapy techniques can be complex and challenging for some clients to understand and apply (Teasdale et al., 2000).
  3. Cultural Sensitivity: Critics argue that MBCT may not fully consider the unique cultural contexts and experiences of individuals from diverse backgrounds (Williams et al., 2014).
  4. Empirical Validation: While there is growing evidence for MBCT, some aspects of its theoretical framework have not been thoroughly validated through rigorous scientific research (Segal et al., 2018).
  5. Individual Differences: MBCT may not be suitable for everyone, and individual differences can affect the therapy's effectiveness (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).

Summary

       In summary, the benefit of MBCT lies in its holistic approach to preventing relapse of depression, reducing anxiety, and improving overall mental health through mindfulness and cognitive therapy techniques. However, its accessibility, complexity, and cultural sensitivity can be potential limitations for some individuals.

       "OptimizeYourCapabilities.com" emphasizes mindfulness focused on core emotions within an easily referenced framework. This approach avoids the need to delve into complex emotions that don't necessarily need to be triggered.

The Benefits of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

      Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a form of psychotherapy that encourages individuals to accept their thoughts and feelings rather than fighting or feeling guilty for them. It focuses on increasing psychological flexibility and helping individuals commit to actions that align with their values. Here are some key benefits of ACT:

  1. Evidence-Based: ACT is supported by research showing its effectiveness in treating various mental health conditions, including anxiety, depression, and chronic pain (The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).

  2. Psychological Flexibility: ACT helps individuals develop the ability to adapt to changing circumstances and engage in meaningful activities despite negative thoughts and feelings (Values in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).
  3. Mindfulness and Acceptance: By promoting mindfulness and acceptance, ACT helps individuals live more fully in the present moment and reduce the impact of negative thoughts (The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).
  4. Value-Driven Actions: ACT encourages individuals to identify their core values and take actions that are consistent with those values, leading to a more fulfilling life (Values in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).
  5. Versatility: ACT has been adapted for various populations and settings, including individuals with substance use disorders, chronic illnesses, and those seeking personal growth (A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education, 2024).

Critiques Against Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

      Despite its many benefits, ACT has faced several critiques:

  1. Complexity: Some critics argue that the concepts of ACT, such as psychological flexibility and cognitive defusion, can be difficult for clients to understand and apply (The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).
  2. Lack of Empirical Support: While ACT has shown promise, some aspects of its theoretical framework have not been thoroughly validated through rigorous scientific research (A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education, 2024).
  3. Measurement Challenges: Quantifying psychological flexibility and the effectiveness of ACT processes can be challenging, making it difficult to conduct robust studies (The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).
  4. Comparison to CBT: Critics have compared ACT to traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and questioned whether it represents a significant advancement or simply a rebranding of existing techniques (Values in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).
  5. Cultural Sensitivity: Similar to CBT, ACT may not fully consider the unique cultural contexts and experiences of individuals from diverse backgrounds (The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2021).

Summary

      In summary, the benefit of ACT lies in its focus on psychological flexibility, mindfulness, and value-driven actions, which can lead to improved mental health and well-being. However, its complexity, lack of empirical support for some aspects, and measurement challenges can be potential limitations for some individuals.

      The core emotions framework of optimizeyourcapabilities.com includes exercises that enhance the 'accepting' process which is causing the benefits of ACT, while it is also extremely simple and very easily referenced. The framework is clear and very well understood even by uneducated people, so the feedback will arise anywhere. You do not need to force yourself to accept what's going on, but you can also connect to it, understand it, and embrace it. You know the reason for it and you can work along. It doesn't require behavioral adjustments beyond what life naturally demands, so extensive proof isn't as necessary.

      This approach not only aligns with natural life processes but also ensures accessibility and applicability across diverse populations. The simplicity and clarity of the framework allow it to be easily integrated into daily routines without the need for complex interventions or extensive background knowledge. As a result, it empowers individuals to take control of their emotional well-being in a practical and meaningful way.

      Furthermore, by fostering a deeper connection and understanding of one's emotions, the framework promotes a holistic approach to mental health. This holistic approach helps prevent the potential for new issues to arise, ensuring a more balanced and comprehensive improvement in overall well-being.

 

The Benefits of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

 

      Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment developed by Marsha Linehan in the late 1980s. It combines cognitive-behavioral techniques with mindfulness practices to help individuals manage intense emotions and improve their quality of life. Here are some key benefits of DBT:

  1. Evidence-Based: DBT is supported by a strong body of research, showing its effectiveness in treating a range of mental health issues, including borderline personality disorder, depression, and anxiety (Angelakis et al., 2022).
  2. Skill Development: DBT teaches practical skills in four key areas: mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness. These skills help individuals navigate emotional challenges and improve their relationships (CONCEPT Professional Training, n.d.).
  3. Reduction in Self-Harm and Suicidal Behaviors: DBT has been shown to significantly reduce self-harming behaviors and suicidal ideation, making it a lifesaving intervention for many individuals (Full Focus Therapy, n.d.).
  4. Holistic Approach: By integrating mindfulness and acceptance strategies, DBT helps individuals accept their emotions and work towards change, promoting overall emotional well-being (McCoy, 2024).

  5. Versatility: DBT has been adapted for various populations and settings, including adolescents, individuals with substance use disorders, and those with eating disorders (Neurolaunch, 2024).

Critiques Against Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

      Despite its many benefits, DBT has faced several critiques:

  1. Long-Term Efficacy: Some critics argue that there is a lack of empirical evidence supporting the long-term effectiveness of DBT outside its original context of treating borderline personality disorder (BPD) and self-harm. While initial studies show promising results, more research is needed to establish its overall efficacy for various mental health conditions (Comtois et al., 2007; Paris, 2010).

  2. Trauma Sensitivity: DBT has been critiqued for not being sufficiently trauma-informed. Critics argue that it doesn't adequately address the trauma histories of many individuals, particularly those with BPD, and may label trauma-related behaviors as "problem behaviors" rather than understanding them in context (Harned, 2013).
  3. Accessibility and Cost: The significant time commitment and cost associated with DBT can be prohibitive for some individuals. The therapy often involves multiple weekly sessions, group skills training, and homework assignments, which can be overwhelming and financially burdensome (Swales & Heard, 2009).
  4. Philosophical Concerns: Some critics question the philosophical underpinnings of DBT, particularly its integration of mindfulness and acceptance strategies derived from Buddhist practices. They argue that this approach may not resonate with all clients, especially those from different cultural or religious backgrounds (Lynch et al., 2007).
  5. Generalizability: There is ongoing debate about whether DBT is as effective for other mental health conditions as it is for BPD. Critics point out that the research methodologies used in studies are often inconsistent, making it difficult to generalize the results to other populations (Kliem et al., 2010).

Summary

      In summary, the benefit of DBT lies in its ability to shift between contradicting perspectives and recognize all emotional stands through mindfulness. However, it may require a significant time commitment, and its complexity can be a potential limitation for some individuals.

      The core emotions program of optimizeyourcapabilities.com teaches mindfulness of all conflicting emotions. Its exercises enhance the 'shifting' process, which provides the benefits of DBT while also addressing common critiques. This simple, time-efficient framework helps individuals develop a broader range of emotional skills while it ensures cultural relevance.

The Benefits of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

 

      Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a widely used form of psychotherapy that focuses on changing negative thought patterns and behaviors to improve emotional well-being. Here are some key benefits of CBT:

  1. Quick Results: CBT is known for its effectiveness in producing quick results compared to other forms of therapy. It is goal-oriented and problem-focused, making it suitable for individuals seeking immediate relief from their symptoms (Fordham et al., 2021).
  2. Empowerment: CBT empowers individuals by teaching them to identify and challenge their negative thoughts and beliefs. This process helps them gain control over their emotions and behaviors, leading to a sense of empowerment (Beck Institute, n.d.).
  3. Evidence-Based: Numerous studies have shown that CBT is effective in treating a range of mental health issues, including depression, anxiety, and PTSD. It is considered as effective as, or even more effective than, other forms of therapy and medication (Angelakis et al., 2022).
  4. Skill Development: CBT helps individuals develop healthy coping strategies and problem-solving skills that they can use in their daily lives. This focus on skill development ensures long-term benefits and relapse prevention (Waltman et al., 2016).
  5. Focus on the Present: Unlike some other therapies that delve into past experiences, CBT focuses on the present and helps individuals deal with current issues and challenges (Beck Institute, n.d.).

Critiques Against Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

      Despite its many benefits, CBT has faced several critiques:

  1. Mechanistic Approach: Critics argue that CBT's structured and goal-oriented approach can be too mechanistic, failing to address the complexities of human emotions and experiences (Waltman et al., 2016).
  2. Cultural Insensitivity: CBT has been critiqued for not being culturally sensitive enough. The methods and approaches used in CBT may not always take into account the cultural contexts and unique experiences of individuals from diverse backgrounds, potentially limiting its effectiveness (Fordham et al., 2021).

  3. Triggering New Issues: In some cases, CBT may inadvertently create new issues by highlighting triggers that individuals might otherwise have been ready to accept or overlook. This focus on identifying and challenging negative thoughts can sometimes lead to increased distress and anxiety (Angelakis et al., 2022).
  4. Overemphasis on Negative Thoughts: Critics argue that CBT's focus on changing negative thoughts may overlook other important aspects of mental health, such as emotional regulation and the development of positive emotions (Waltman et al., 2016).

Summary

      In summary, the strength of CBT lies in its ability to provide cognitive clarity to manage emotional dysregulation. However, it may not adequately address the emotional aspects, and in some cases, the cognitive focus might lead to additional complexities.

      The core emotions framework of optimizeyourcapabilities.com is highly adaptable; it includes exercises that refine cognitive processes and deliver the benefits of CBT, while also enhancing other core emotions to achieve better flexibility and effectiveness. There is no importance to take any stand on cultural-sensitive issues and it doesn't concentrate on problems. Additionally, the framework focuses on a balanced approach to emotional development, preventing the potential for triggering new issues and providing a more holistic improvement in well-being.

      However, this framework is not yet expected to be flawless and is of course not intended to replace CBT, but to compliment it. A skilled and licensed therapist can choose whether to start the session with the detanglement-exercise and then shift to CBT or vice versa. Let the story unfold by itself.

Concept Sources

      Let's begin by reviewing the existing approaches. By doing so, we can swiftly comprehend the origins and necessity of this framework.

Detanglement

      By grasping the foundational emotional elements that make up our consistency, we can recognize that the emotions triggering or restraining us are simply because of having some core-emotion-bricks intertwined. A partial list of these emotional components is already accessible. This is a great help also while trying to make minor improvements, that are not associated with a disorder or a deeply rooted issue.

 

 

References

  • A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education. (2024). The Psychological Record, 74, 101-132. Retrieved from Springer.
  • Angelakis, I., Huggett, C., Gooding, P., Panagioti, M., & Hodkinson, A. (2022). Effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapies of varying complexity in reducing depression in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 221(2), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2022.35
  • Bar-On, R., & Parker, J. D. (2000). The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School, and in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-00355-000
  • Beck Institute. (n.d.). CBT Research. Retrieved from https://beckinstitute.org/cbt-resources/resources-for-professionals-and-students/research-corner/
  • CONCEPT Professional Training. (n.d.). Pros and Cons of DBT. Retrieved from https://concept.paloaltou.edu/resources/business-of-practice-blog/pros-and-cons-of-dbt
  • Comtois, K. A., Elwood, L., Holdcraft, L. C., Smith, W. R., & Simpson, T. L. (2007). Effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy in a community mental health setting. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14(1), 406-414. Link
  • Elliott, R., Watson, J. C., Goldman, R. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (2004). Learning emotion-focused therapy: The process-experiential approach to change. American Psychological Association. Link
  • Fordham, B., Sugavanam, T., Edwards, K., Stallard, P., Howard, R., Nair, R. D., Copsey, B., Lee, H., Howick, J., & Hemming, K. (2021). The evidence for cognitive behavioural therapy in any condition, population or context: a meta-review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 51(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720005292
  • Full Focus Therapy. (n.d.). Pros and Cons of DBT Therapy. Retrieved from https://www.fullfocustherapy.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-dbt-therapy
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books. https://www.amazon.com/Emotional-Intelligence-Matter-More-Than/dp/055338371X
  • Greenberg, L. S. (2017). Emotion-focused therapy (Revised ed.). American Psychological Association. Link
  • Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (1988). Emotion-focused therapy for depression. Guilford Press. Link
  • Greenwald, R. (2007). EMDR Within a Phase Model of Trauma-Informed Treatment. Norton. Retrieved from Amazon.

  • Harned, M. S. (2013). Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 20(3), 310-316. Link
  • Jha, A. P., Krompinger, J., & Baime, M. J. (2007). Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(2), 109-119. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/CABN.7.2.109
  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. Delta. Retrieved from Amazon.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-156. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-03824-002
  • Kliem, S., Kröger, C., & Kosfelder, J. (2010). Dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis using mixed-effects modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(6), 936-951. Link
  • Lynch, T. R., Trost, W. T., Salsman, N., & Linehan, M. M. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 181-205. Link
  • McCoy, M. B. B. (2024, October 24). I’m a therapist who tried Wellnite online therapy for a month — here’s what happened. Everyday Health. Retrieved from https://www.everydayhealth.com/emotional-health/wellnite-review/
  • Neurolaunch. (2024). DBT Therapy: Comprehensive Analysis of Pros and Cons. Retrieved from https://neurolaunch.com/pros-and-cons-of-dbt-therapy/
  • Paris, J. (2010). Effectiveness of different psychotherapy approaches in the treatment of BPD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 12(1), 56-60. Link
  • Rasmussen, B. A Critical Examination of CBT in Clinical Social Work Practice. Clin Soc Work J 46, 165–173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-017-0632-7
  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2018). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. Guilford Press. Retrieved from Guilford Press.
  • Shapiro, F. (2017). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures. Guilford Press. Retrieved from Guilford Press.
  • Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. WW Norton & Company. https://books.google.com/books/about/Full_Catastrophe_Living.html?id=QeGGPwAACAAJ
  • Sun, K. (2009, March 2). Four drawbacks of cognitive therapy. *Psychology Today*. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-justice-and-responsibility-league/200903/four-drawbacks-cognitive-therapy
  • Swales, M. A., & Heard, H. L. (2009). Dialectical behaviour therapy: Distinctive features. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Link
  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Williams, J. M. G. (2000). Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.615.
  • The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from Oxford Academic.
  • Thoma, N. C., & McKay, D. (Eds.). (2015). Working with emotion in cognitive-behavioral therapy: Techniques for clinical practice. The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-57879-000
  • Values in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021). In The Oxford Handbook of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (pp. 271-294). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from Oxford Academic.
  • van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books. Retrieved from Penguin.
  • Waltman, S. H., Creed, T. A., & Beck, A. T. (2016). Are the effects of cognitive behavior therapy for depression falling? Review and critique of the evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12152
  • Watson, J. C., Goldman, R. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (2007). Case studies in emotion-focused treatment of depression: A comparison of good and poor outcome. American Psychological Association. Link
  • Williams, J. M. G., Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2014). The Mindful Way through Depression: Freeing Yourself from Chronic Unhappiness. Guilford Press. Retrieved from Guilford Press.

Your Mirror

      The build up of this information will soon be introduced, but the first reference is You. Simply view your own psyche as presented on our homepage and ask yourself: How does this apply to me? Which of these core feelings are my strengths? Do I often wonder how others accomplish things that I can’t? How do I feel about that?

 

 

CAUTION!

This website and page have not yet been peer-reviewed. The authors welcome constructive criticism, and will publish any scholarly work that supports or challenges the effectivness of this method.

Please contact the authors if you are ready to peer-review this system.